A parliamentary report urges the government to work on improving the school curriculum to develop in students ‘‘understanding, empathy, and an openness to diversity’’. It seems the adults in the room also need to learn some lessons.
It’s always troubling when the term Australian values is given an airing. Whatever the intentions or origins of its surfacing, it feels as though there’s a quiet desperation about it. As though it is seeking reaffirmation of what it means, and how by its uttering, it thus helps solidify the definition of us. This is all the more acute when it falls into the arms of that shape-shifting creature: the politician.
A bipartisan federal parliamentary committee recently recommended that secondary students needed to be better educated about Australian values. It also urged better teaching on Indigenous history (no complaints with that), and an increase in knowledge about civics and democracy (good luck with that).
The Senate inquiry which resulted in the report took 18 months. Some of its recommendations are long overdue, such as developing resources so that First Nations history can be properly taught. However, instilling a greater appreciation of civics and citizenship night be problematic.
Labor senator Kim Carr, who chaired the review, acknowledged, “What is undoubtedly true is that the level of civic engagement and debate in this country is disturbingly low.”
Perhaps, just perhaps, this might be because the level of admiration and trust people have in most politicians is barely able to rise above the floors of the House of Representatives or the Senate. How does this square with building a tower of Australian values when the people we elect to represent us are held in such poor, indeed contemptible, regard?
It is all very well to bathe in the reflected glory of our inestimable Australian values – we give everyone a fair go, we help out our neighbours when they’re in trouble, we fight for the underdog, we look after one another – but it is not the whole truth.
Values, like numbers, can be positive and negative. It’s a fine line between mateship/larrikin and self-interest/criminal. There’s not too many steps from being a larrikin to being a ratbag.
No one can reasonably argue we give the unemployed a fair go. For more than two decades, governments, of both colours, were content to leave welfare payments at a level that hovered around indifference and poverty. Forty dollars a day. Go and live on that. There’s no value of understanding or compassion in that. It is welcome, and condemnatory, that it has taken a pandemic to see a rise in the payment, and after the just announced rise of $25 a week, contemptible. $43.50 a week. Go and live on that.
If that’s a lifeline as the Prime Minister asserts, perhaps he misunderstands the meaning and point of a lifeline.
It is somewhat ironic that the Department of Home Affairs sees itself as the guardian of Australian values. On its website these values are expounded, in part as: a fair go for all that embraces mutual respect, tolerance, compassion for those in need and equality of opportunity for all.
For years Australia has denied those points, indeed sacrificed basic human kindness, on the altar of righteous nationalism, and has treated asylum seekers as criminals, indeed not as humans, but illegal maritime arrivals as Scott Morrison once described them. The Scott Morrison with the model of a boat and the tag I Stopped These in his parliamentary office. The Scott Morrison who is now prime minister.
As to white Australia’s relationship with First Nations people, let’s put those points of a fair go for all that embraces mutual respect, tolerance, compassion for those in need and equality of opportunity for all against the reality of being Indigenous in this country.
Let’s teach those values to school children.
Kids learn from example. You can teach them in a classroom for as long as you like, but if they walk outside and see their elders acting differently, which has greater impact?
The report urges the government to work on improving the curriculum to develop in students ‘‘understanding, empathy, and an openness to diversity’’.
It’s a nice idea. But perhaps there’d be more value in directing the message to the adults in the room.
Warwick McFadyen is an award-winning journalist with more than 40 years’ experience in metropolitan media. He has held senior writing and editing positions with The Age, has won two Walkley Awards and four Quill Awards, and was highly commended in the Keith Dunstan Award for commentary in 2020’s Quills. He has published two books of poetry, On Reaching Land’s End and The Life and Times of Mr Agio and Other Poems.
Comments
9 responses to “How ironic that the Department of Home Affairs sees itself as the guardian of Australian values”
“Don’t it always seem to be that you don’t know what you’ve got ’til it’s gone…”. We’re children of the Enlightenment, so steeped in its values that we don’t know they’re there, and that they’re essential to our lives. But if we’re awake, we notice how those values are under insidious attack. Respect for science, rational discourse, democratic decision making, the rule of law – it’s an old saw that constant vigilance is the price of freedom, and these are going to be lost unless we start being vigilant in both directions.
I spent thirty years teaching students from Year 7 to Year 12 what I like to think were the common values of a society based on the precept; ” love one another as I have loved you”, ascribed to an itinerant Jewish preacher some 2,000 years ago That was and is a Christian morality and may I write a tenant of all the world’s a major religions .
Rather than the Department of Home Affairs deciding what teachers should teach our young people, those of us with the qualifications, study and experience should be making that decision. Gobbels used his position in Germany to reduce the ethics of a civilized German people to the sort of ‘hate speech’ that terrifies educators even today.Let us not ever go down that path.
Agreed. Not the Department of Home Affairs, or the Department of Education, or any refuge for post-modern academics who don’t care for the pursuit of truth any more than they care for the young people themselves. As several others have said, values are better caught than taught!
I am troubled about the idea of “Australian Values”. I would have thought that “values” are mostly universal such as being kind, empathetic, fair and inclusive in how we treat each other.
Closet fascists always appeal to ‘values’. They just confuse them and others.
Australia has not got a “civics” department teaching what is Australian core values DHA, historically got the job because of its link to the promotion of citizenship and multiculturalsim. Our political and judiciary system is a core Australia value. As an immigrant country, the values are not going to be static and changes brought in by immigrants, when adopted, becomes an Australian value. Consider the statement: “Multiculturalism in Australia is now mainstream” any problems with that? At least DHA has open consultation with the diverse communities on these sensitive topics for nearly 5 decades (since Al Grassby was Immigration Minister). Educating school children is more important that the adult. If the education is strong enough it could withstand parental pressure and when they become adults, they will pass on their learned message to the next generation.
The Australian government has been looked at, in recent years, as a model by many in Europe on how you can cruelly incarcerate refugees. How you can inflict the maximum pain and punishment on them.
And let’s face it- there are bundles of electoral votes in the varying degrees of cruelty. The more extreme and inhuman, the more votes. The mirror on our society does not lie.
Students don’t need a hypocritical curriculum. They learn the reality very quickly.
You are quite correct in your observations, especially that of young people learning from their adult associates and families.
But “Don’t do as I do, do as I tell you” has been a social hypocrisy seemingly for ever.
I think I may have mentioned on one of these forums recently but anyway here it is again if so – the Japanese have a saying which translated says: Children grow up watching the backs of their parents. Quite clearly not what the parents say – but what the parents do. You are so right Nigel!