War in all its forms is awful, so let’s support those who conduct it on our behalf and, when they come back, go easy on them. They were only doing our bidding.
These days our soldiers are often put in impossible situations where the enemy is indistinguishable from the general community and follows no rules. While there can be no excuses for ill-discipline or criminal conduct by our forces, let us try to understand the dangers they face and the horrors they witness. Our forces should not remain in Afghanistan a moment longer.
The current outrage about the alleged criminal conduct of a small number of special forces soldiers in Afghanistan is justified, but let’s be careful not to tar all our soldiers with the same brush.
Both of my grandfathers served in the British Army on the Western Front in the First World War and both were gassed and suffered other injuries from their time in the trenches. I never got to meet my paternal grandfather, who died from his injuries well before I was born, but I’m proud to have his medals.
Growing up in England in the 1950s and ’60s, there was a sense of pride, a belief in the invincibility of Britain: the Second World War was still fresh in people’s memories, and we’d won that, hadn’t we? Films and comic books about the war were everywhere, and I was fascinated by the apparent glory of it all, even though the part of London where we lived was still horribly scarred from the blitz, piles of rubble everywhere 10 years after the Armistice.
My mother and I would occasionally visit her parents in the country, and I’d buttonhole my grandfather to try to get him to tell me about his experiences in the trenches. He’d shoo me away. I didn’t know it at the time, but it was because he was ashamed, he thought I’d never understand.
Years later, as a teenager with nothing else to do, I joined the British Army myself, and did three tours of duty in Belfast at the height of “the troubles”. It was only then that my grandfather was prepared to share his stories with me, because even though the shootings and bombings on the streets of Belfast couldn’t compare with what my granddad had experienced, I was a brother in arms. I knew what it felt like to have been a soldier in action, and the feelings of fear and guilt and shame that went with it.
Like most recruits I’d never really thought about what armies and soldiers were there for. To me and my comrades it was an opportunity to have some adventures, play a lot of sport and travel abroad to sunny places well away from the depressing grey dampness of England.
This may sound naïve, but despite being trained in a number of ways to injure, maim and kill people, we never actually thought we’d have to do it, until we did. I remember years later trying to explain to a good and trusted friend what had happened and how it felt, but I still remember the look of disgust on his face to this day. I felt like an animal, and I thought that I’d only been doing my job.
And that was why my grandfather wouldn’t tell me anything until I’d been there too, when he knew I’d have some hope of understanding it all, and that I wouldn’t judge him too harshly. And then we’d talk about the futility of it all and how it should never happen again, both of us knowing that it would.
And now, many years later, not much has changed. War follows war, and soldiers still do what they’re paid to do while politicians, the media and public wring their hands about bastardisation and the poor behaviour of our forces at home and abroad, and the terrible toll that war takes on innocent civilians. And then we send the soldiers off again to do more inhuman things to other humans, while the politicians we elected ride around on tanks or pose for photo opportunities wearing camouflage and holding weapons to look tough.
Meanwhile, our young men and women are fighting other young men and women, other peoples’ brothers and sisters and sons and daughters. And while we still send our young people to war, and will do again, let us take our share of the responsibility for what happens next. Try to imagine yourself in a situation where you have been shot at, and seen your mates killed and innocent civilians blown to pieces by an enemy which has absolutely no regard for “the rules of war”, an oxymoron if ever there was one. Our countrymen are killed and wounded, inexcusable atrocities are committed by both sides and it usually seems hard to find a winner when the smoke has cleared and the bombs and bullets stop.
And when our servicemen come home again, from Afghanistan, or from other conflicts that have nothing to do with us, let’s welcome them. I still remember how shocked I was when I first came to Australia and learnt that returning Vietnam veterans had been treated like lepers, when surely it had been the Australian people who had sent them there in the first place. War in all its forms is awful, so let’s support those who conduct it on our behalf and, when they come back, go easy on them. They were only doing our bidding
And, if there is an opportunity for anything positive to come out of all the current turmoil, surely it is to bring our soldiers home from Afghanistan now.
Jon Blackwell is an ex-British Special Forces soldier, having successfully avoided a grisly end in three tours of duty in Belfast. He then saw the light (twice), and trained as a social worker and emigrated to Australia. He became a senior health service manager in Vic, SA, WA and on the Central Coast of NSW. He also has been CEO of Workcover NSW, and, more recently, Habitat for Humanity Australia. Now retired, Jon lives in Avoca Beach where he amuses himself by attempting to surf.
Comments
9 responses to “Don’t tar all our soldiers with the same brush”
Well written!
I agree … it is a Government, on behalf of the Australian people, that sends its nation’s soldiers to war. But, it is the same Government who is responsible for ensuring that training is appropriate, not only to confront the battlefield challenges, but also, the moral challenges that might exist. The Government was complicit in turning a ‘blind eye’ to matters associated with breaches of Rules Of Engagement (ROE) in Vietnam. Advice was requested from the responsible Minister that military training had been revised to ensure that the moral failings which occurred in Vietnam could never happen again. This assurance was given. It proved ill-founded.
The following examples (from two different publications) emphasise the differing perspectives that applied re Vietnam:
“The ROE were that we had to positively identify enemy before we engaged. In essence, this meant that they had to be carrying weapons. One night we were in an ambush. Using a first-generation night vision device, the sentry saw four legs … two followed by another two. Upper bodies were obscured. Whoever they were, they were breaking the curfew. This did not mean they were enemy, however. After ‘standing to’, I counted down over the radio and all tanks switched on their searchlights. There was no need to give the order to fire. Illuminated was the biggest buck deer anyone had ever seen. The four legs were explained.”
—————————————————————
“One book I read was ‘Contact Wait Out!: A Vietnam Diary’ by Bruce Ravenscroft. The author describes an ambush he was involved in. A number of enemy were killed and one wounded (who could be heard to be in pain). The ambush commander radioed his HQ and explained the situation. He was told not to bring back any prisoners. All members of the ambush party stood up and “emptied their magazines into the enemy soldier”.
I couldn’t believe what I was reading. My surprise was compounded by the fact that the Foreword of the book, which described it as “a valuable addition to the documents about the war from an Australian’s perspective”, was written by a serving senior Army officer.
“I …..learnt that returning Vietnam veterans were treated like lepers”. Well maybe an occasional one was but generally speaking this is untrue and is a myth.
As I recall, the RSL itself was less than welcoming.
Some RSLs and some RSL members were less than welcoming but apparently this was not typical. The Honest History website has a good summary of how returning Vietnam Vets were treated.
Jon, ‘we’ did not send troops to Viet Nam, the Gulf, Iraq and Afghanistan, the LNP did. There was opposition to those deployments. The awful PM of the day was so confident of popular support for our involvement in the war in Viet Nam that he introduced conscription.
There was support for our involvement in East Timor but Howard and Downer had to be dragged into it.
With the exception of ET, Australian troops have been used as mercinaries for the past 60 years as insurance for the US to fulfill it’s treaty obligations.
But didn’t “we” elect the LNP?
The point has been made below. The LNP did not fight an election on sending or keeping troops fighting overseas.
Unless defensive, war is indefensible. Our troops in Afghanistan, Iraq (and Syria?) are not defending Australia. Let’s get them out of there.
Then lets make it impossible to deploy troops overseas without the express approval of Federal Parliament, and then only after a public and informed debate.
I am afraid that in the wake of the Brereton Report some soldiers will become scapegoats and made to answer for our war crimes. While spun to indicate a firm and fitting response to the Brereton Report, it will be a travesty of justice unless the accusations go all the way up the chain of command, all the way to former PM John Howard who decided, without Parliamentary approval, to send them there in the first place.
I agree, Australian forces should not be committed to overseas conflicts without public debate and parliamentary approval.