Premier Gladys Berejiklian needs to call time on her premiership by next month in the hope that her political legacy is in reasonable nick despite her personal reputation being in tatters. As to where it all began? Read on.
As Transport Minister, Treasurer and then Premier, Berejiklian was the hardest working Minister in the Coalition Government. There was not a skerrick of scandal attached to her name. She represented a monumental change from the corruption-riddled days of NSW Labor.
Her timing was exceptionally favourable. It coincided with the arrival of President Donald Trump and a tsunami of ridicule and hatred generated by MeToo, Respect and other chat lines fostered by the US Democratic Party.
Premier Gladys was adopted by Sydney websites committed to the women’s movement, feminism and gender-based politics as an antidote to Trumpism. Another tsunami erupted: chat lines supporting Gladys and her pro-developer Coalition government went into over-drive.
Ms Berejiklian grew more powerful. But her relations with women politicians – Liberal, National, Green or Independent – worsened. Jillian Skinner, Pru Goward, Clover Moore, Katrina Hodgkinson and Patricia Forsythe were treated appallingly, according to some observers.
She surrounded herself with Liberal hacks who covered her in flattery. They kept away the bad news, and only gave her the good news. She loved the “bubble” they created around her and she became increasingly intolerant of Ministers, civil servants or contractors who stood in her way, whispered the corridors of power.
Her shenanigans with former Liberal minister Daryl Maguire are a tale of colossal misjudgment, secrecy and apparent large-scale corruption, her opponents claim. No one in politics believes she didn’t know about “Dazza’s” land deals, which stood to make him (and her) millionaires. She insulted the intelligence of the public by stating she had done nothing wrong.
I’m not the only journalist who has called her to account. Top investigative reporters, Adele Ferguson, Michael West, Michael Pascoe and contributors to John Menadue’s online site, Pearls & Irritations, have practised their craft with splendid professionalism, but I can’t say the same about the NSW Parliamentary press gallery or the Murdoch press, which appears to live off press releases and pictures that are supplied in government “packages”. One day they write that Gladys is on the ropes and her situation is parlous; the next day she is in charge again, decisive and the heroine of the hour.
There is a Shakespearean quality to Empress Glad’s departure in March (if it is to be so). In Act 1, Scene 2 of the Bard’s mighty tragedy, Julius Caesar, Caesar and his party are stopped by a soothsayer who calls: “Caesar!” And Caesar replies: “Who calls? Who is it that calls on me? I hear a tongue, shriller than all the music. Speak; Caesar is turn’d to hear.”
Soothsayer: Beware the ides of March.
Caesar: What man is that?
Brutus: A soothsayer bids you beware the ideas of March.
Caesar: Set him before me; let me see his face.
Cassius: Fellow, come from the throng; look upon Caesar.
Caesar: What say’st thou to me now? Speak once again.
Soothsayer: Beware the ides of March.
Caesar: He is a dreamer; let us leave him.
And the conversation closes.
Later in Scene 2, Caesar is speaking to Mark Anthony:
Caesar: Let me have men about me that are fat;
Sleek-headed men, and such as sleep o’nights.
Yond Cassius has a lean and hungry look;
He thinks too much: such men are dangerous.
Mark Anthony: Fear him not, Caesar; he’s not dangerous;
He is a noble Roman.
Caesar is determined to finish his portrait of Cassius.
Caesar: He reads much;
He is a great observer… he loves no plays;
He hears no music.
Seldom he smiles …
Such men as he be never at heart’s ease
Whiles they behold a greater than themselves;
And therefore are they very dangerous.
They leave and the scene ends …
Any similarity between Cassius and her deputy, Dominic Perrottet, is purely Shakespearean. In reality, there is a large field of candidates who want to be chief executive of NSW Inc. However, the NSW Libs are a hollowed-out version of their former selves. Their gene pool of talent is shallow.
Most are in politics for what it can give them, not what they can give the people of NSW. Gladys is a product of this culture; it has infected NSW Labor and the Nationals as well. They seem to be in it – for themselves! It’s the Liberal way – outsource, bring in highly-paid “consultants”, sack experience, ignore science, make a quid for yourself. It’s neo-liberalism at its finest – selfish individualism and bugger the rest of us.
Is the Soothsayer correct and will the ides of March herald an assassination outside the chamber and a takeover by Cassius?
This article has been republished from Come the Revolution, 5 February, 2021. Click here to read the original article.
Alex Mitchell is a former State Political Editor of Sydney’s Sun-Herald and a regular Friday contributor to John Menadue’s Pearls & Irritations. His latest book is Murder in Melbourne – The Untold Story of Palestinian exchange student Aiia Maasarwe.
Comments
8 responses to “Bye bye Premier Gladys – it’s time to go”
And verily should Aunty Glad “beware the ideas (sic) of March”, though those ideas are not really necessary until March 2022.
Mr Mitchell: while recognising para 2 is a popular view, in my opinion there needs to be a public inquiry to validate that. Mr Austen’s post of 2 March 2020, based on the public record, indicated why.
Prior to, but continuing after Coalition election in 2011, the public record discloses unusual occurrences in NSW rail policy (Sydney Metro – a taste of which can be seen in Mr Austen’s other posts on Pearls). A timeline to the end of 2018 is at dogsbreakfast for all at the jadebeagle.com. Sources are noted.
Correction, rebuttal would be welcomed and acknowledged. So far there has been none. On that, see the report and proceedings of the Legislative Council Inquiry into Sydney Metro extension to Bankstown (2019-20).
The above is consistent with your observations of the NSW Parliamentary Press Gallery, which could be extended beyond them.
‘Analysis’ has been limited to sidetracks, second order matters – like light rail, and distractions like the size of cost blow-outs rather than their disguise and train buff trivia.
I do not know what the top investigative journalists have been doing, but in respect of transport in NSW under the Coalition Government the published results have been rather less than top investigation and reflect very poorly on that trade.
Best wishes
my post of 2 March 2020, also exclusively based on the public record,
The link doesn’t work, and I had no idea how to find whatever article you were referring to on your site.
Try https://www.thejadebeagle.com/
Nope. Found ‘Dogs breakfast’, ‘Dogs breakfast for two’ and ‘Dogs breakfast for three’, but no ‘Dogs breakfast for all’. I assume there’s a readable article in there somewhere, but so far inaccessible by me.
sorry about that. rule said no links. lets break them for once. try https://www.thejadebeagle.com/dogs-breakfast-for-all.html adult version. Appendix 2, p.55 is a table of unusual occurences
and if you can be bothered reading it, this https://www.thejadebeagle.com/updated-comments-on-sydenham-bankstown-metro-conversion.html gives some flavour about more recent assertions made to the Legislative Council Committee about the Sydney Metro decision making process.
best wishes
Why should Gladys go? The NSW election is not until March 2022.