Few peoples define themselves through their military history more stridently than Australians. The truth, though, is that our military history primarily is one of imperial subservience, self-delusion and denial. (more…)

Few peoples define themselves through their military history more stridently than Australians. The truth, though, is that our military history primarily is one of imperial subservience, self-delusion and denial. (more…)

When did US generals become arbiters of Australia’s strategic policy like it’s some banana republic. (more…)
For nearly a decade Coalition governments have overseen defence policy. Now Defence policy is in need of serious reform. (more…)

Environmentally, the submarine acquisition could be a disaster. Where in Australia are the submarines to be based? Could their home ports become contaminated? Where do we dispose of their reactors at the end-of-service life? (more…)

The US alliance is defended as maintaining a rules-based international order, to Australia’s benefit. Yet Trump’s return may see a rapid retreat.

Australia’s foreign and defence ministers are giving respectability to Britain’s lunge for old-time glory. (more…)

As the world’s nuclear arsenals build even more killing power, the need for Australia to abandon this perilous defence arrangement only increases. (more…)
Although it will be Australia’s biggest military purchase, the submarine deal is mired in strategic uncertainties.

Our leaders are uneducated on history. They’re repeating mistakes that had catastrophic consequences for Australia in the Pacific in the 20th century. (more…)

As Australia locks itself into the US military machine, we increase the risks of retaliatory attacks on Pine Gap in the Northern Territory.

When the nuclear-powered submarines are delivered they will be expensive white elephants. The project will distort defence policy for a generation.
(more…)

Australian forgetfulness of the wartime friendship and suffering of the Timorese people was crowned in 2004 by a grubby act of government greed.

To peacefully resolve the brewing crises over Ukraine and Taiwan the major powers will need to consider the strategic perspectives of the other side.

Militarisation has become a means of promoting economic welfare, and the ‘defence industry hub’ in Geelong is just the latest such project.

Britain is the greatest beneficiary of the nuclear submarine deal for an array of reasons – the gains for the US are minor while the benefits for Australia are debatable.

The terms of reference for the defence suicide royal commission ignore the direct cause of the issues that affect veterans — war.

America’s chaotic withdrawal from Afghanistan, where it had aimed to bolster international security, will create a new breeding ground for terrorism.

Peter Dutton’s support for the US over China risks putting wind beneath the wings of Washington’s hawks. We have been here many times before. (more…)

There are many potential benefits to Australia not having any submarines — it should even consider it needs a military at all.

The nuclear sleight-of-hand, the budgeted billions and the diplomatic debacle warrant deep examination — it’s time to bring it all out in to the open.

Amazingly, it is only four decades since it was believed that a nuclear strike on Pine Gap would do little damage to Alice Springs. No longer.
(more…)

The controversial AUKUS deal has potentially dangerous implications for a global non-proliferation regime already facing an array of challenges.

The most egregious example of our assistance to US missions could be terminated without threatening genuine US strategic interests, or the alliance.

While never spelled out by our government, the nuclear deterrence pact means that Australia would ask the US to commit genocide in its defence.

Australia is still trying to find its place in Asia, Paul Keating says, which explains why we’re so preoccupied with Taiwan and China.

More than ever, Australia is a suitable piece of real estate for the US espionage and war-gaming. A detailed analysis by Richard Tanter. (more…)

The first Anzacs challenged the reasons for war, so the federal education minister’s insistence that Anzac Day cannot be ‘contested’ at school is political pantomime. (more…)

Words matter, and the way the Australian War Memorial’s spruikers talk about its expansion and displays speaks volumes.

Driven by its military-industrial complex the United States depends on continual war. As the War on Terrorism peters out a new enemy is invented — China.

The Australian Strategic Policy Institute’s claims of fearless independence ring hollow as foreign governments and corporate entities shower it with money. (more…)