US and British arms industry companies and their little mentioned but crucial support cast of Taiwanese military, lawmakers and government official counterparts are opposed to China-Taiwan reunification, because the current situation acts as their ATM, generating billions of dollars in profit.
The recent visit to China by former Taiwan President Ma Ying-jeou – the first time a Taiwanese president has visited the country since the defeated Republic of China government retreated to Taiwan in 1949 – has set off shock waves in the United States, Australia and other countries bent on a non-peaceful resolution of the China Taiwan stand-off.
According to reports on the under-reported but closely watched visit by western media, Ma stressed that China and Taiwan must do everything possible to avoid war.
Accompanied by a delegation of academics and college students, Ma in comments provided by his office noted:
“People on both sides of the Taiwan Strait are Chinese people, and are both descendants of the Yan and Yellow Emperors.”
Despite the common history and ancestry, Ma acknowledged the magnitude of the reunification challenge.
“We sincerely hope that the two sides will work together to pursue peace, avoid war, and strive to revitalise China”.
“This is an unavoidable responsibility of Chinese people on both sides of the Strait, and we must work hard.”
More alarming to the US are the comments of French President Macron to the French media following his recent visit to China and meetings with Chinese leader, Xi Jinping. In his interview conducted with Les Echos and Politico, Macron told the reporters that “Europe faces a great risk” if it “gets caught up in crises that are not ours.”
“The paradox would be that, overcome with panic, we believe we are just America’s followers,” Macron said. “The question Europeans need to answer… is it in our interest to accelerate [a crisis] on Taiwan? No. The worse thing would be to think that we Europeans must become followers on this topic and take our cue from the US agenda and a Chinese overreaction.”
Much stronger words on Taiwan and the need for Europe’s “strategic autonomy” were in fact expressed by Macron in the posted redacted interview so as to avoid a bigger controversy with Taiwan, the US and US allies.
The French position on China and Taiwan especially should be required reading for Australians, especially those who have not given thought to or have dismissed outright, the possibility of a China Taiwan rapprochement or reunification.
Anti reunification forces
Left unsaid by Ma and Macron is that the forces opposed to reunification of China and Taiwan are at their most virulent and most hostile point in history. Led by the United States, Australia and a supportive cast of suppliant allies, the anti reunification forces are using Taiwan to confront and subvert China and forestall any prospect of peaceful reunification.
What matters for the anti reunification forces is not the fate of Taiwan or the opinions of the Chinese and Taiwanese population. What is at stake is to win the US effort to contain and isolate China and to repulse any challenge to the US monopoly of power, wealth and dominance taken for granted in a US led unipolar world in which any attempt to resist American hegemonic control is portrayed as an assault on a ‘democratic’ ‘rules-based’ international world system defined by the US and backed by Australia but not agreed to by the great majority of the world’s countries.
High stakes behind forestalling reunification
Australian and other western media and policy makers will not admit it but reunification of China and Taiwan will dramatically change the world order from the current Western dominated one to a new one which will more fairly reflect the diverse interests and values of the international community; and not that of China alone.
This is the existential fear which has driven Trump and Biden, and western media, to engage in what has been described as the “relentless”, “off the chart”, anti China “mass hysteria” taking place on a daily basis. Australian leaders and media are not very far behind the American propaganda and war mongering curve.
Thus the resort to the Tibet card; the Hong Kong card; the Uygher card; the South China Seas card; and the Taiwan anti-reunification card.
The strength of the anti reunification forces should not be underestimated. It is not only western media, politicians and ‘democracy’ lovers in the US and Australia that are intent on making Taiwan the sacrificial pawn in a proxy war to ensure that China – and the rest of the world – remain subordinate and shackled to a western dominated world system.
Behind the political theatre and publicity grabbing actions of Nancy Pelosi, Kevin McCarthy, and other anti China newbies from US Democrat and Republican parties, and Scott Morrison, Peter Dutton, et. al. in Canberra, stands the US military industrial complex and a cohesive and vociferous array of anti China interest groups looking at their positions and pocket books, and spooked by the loss of US leadership in the global economy and geo-politics.
Especially noteworthy are US and British arms industry companies who have Taiwan, and now Australia, as their ATM generating billions of dollars for them and their little mentioned but crucial support cast of Taiwanese military, lawmakers and government official counterparts.
Table 1: US – Taiwan recent military sales
Biden administration – $3.506 billion
- March 1, 2023, $619 million for hundreds of missiles and other F-16 munitions
- December 28, 2022, $180 million for Volcano anti-tank systems
- December 6, 2022, $330 million for aircraft standard spare parts and $98 million for non-standard spare parts that would support “F-16, C-130, Indigenous Defence Fighter (IDF), and all other aircraft and systems or subsystems of U.S. origin.”
- September 2, 2022 – $665.4 million for support to Surveillance Radar Program, $355 million for 60 (sixty) AGM-84L-1 Harpoon Block II missiles and related support, and $85.6 million for one hundred (100) AIM-9X Block II Sidewinder tactical missiles and related equipment.
July 15, 2022 – $108 million for technical support for tank and combat vehicles.
- June 8, 2022 – $120 million for ship spare parts.
- April 5, 2022 – $95 million for contractor technical assistance to support Patriot systems.
- February 7, 2022 – $100 million for support services for Patriot systems for five years
- August 4, 2021 – $750 million: M109A6 Paladin 155mm Self-Propelled Howitzers and related vehicles/equipment
Trump administration – $18.27 billion
- 2020 (multiple dates) – $5.8631 billion: Harpoon missiles ($2.37 billion, Oct. 26) AGM-84H SLAM-ER Missiles ($1.008 billion, Oct. 21), PAC-3 missile recertification ($620 million, July 9), MQ-9B remote piloted aircraft ($600 million, Nov. 3), HIMARS launchers, support, and equipment ($436.1 million, Oct. 21), MS-110 Recce Pods ($367.2 million, Oct. 21), Field Information Communications System (FICS) ($280 million, Dec. 7), Mk-48 Heavy Weight Torpedoes ($180 million, May 20)
- 2019 (multiple dates) – $10.72356 billion: F-16s and associated support ($8 billion, August 20), F-16 pilot training & logistics support ($500 million, April 15), M1A2 Abrams tanks ($2 billion, July 8) and Stinger missiles ($223.56 million, July 8)
- 2018 (all on Sept 24) – $330 million: Foreign Military Sales Order II ($330 million)
- 2017 (all on June 29) – $1.363 billion: radar ($400 million); AGM-154C JSOW Missiles ($185.5 million), AGM-88B HARM Missiles ($147.5 million), SM-2 Block IIIA Missiles ($125 million); Mk-54 Lightweight Torpedo Conversion Kits ($175 million), Mk-48 Heavyweight Torpedoes ($250 million); AN/SLQ-32 Electronic Warfare System upgrades ($80 million)
From 1979 to 2020, 77% of major conventional arms imported by Taiwan were of U.S. origin, according to the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI)’s arms transfers database.
Note: The data here does not include direct commercial sales.
Source: https://www.forumarmstrade.org/ustaiwan.html
Together, they are inflaming tensions in the Taiwan Straits and South China Sea whilst deluding Taiwan into the belief that the US is willing to go to war over Taiwan, and that Taiwan is able to defend itself should China abandon its bid for peaceful reunification.
Should this happen Taiwan will definitely become the scorched-earth battlefield that Washington’s war hawks have long been preparing for.
Is this what Australia is committing itself to for the present and coming generation?
