Geopolitics Donald Trump has done little to counter China, and Joe Biden would do no better. We must face up to a future of fading US power in our region.
Leaders matter. Whether nations flourish or stumble in the face of challenges depends a lot on how well they are led.
America today faces its gravest challenges in many decades, so the quality of its leadership matters more than ever. And yet this year American voters have been offered a choice between Donald Trump and Joe Biden.
What a choice. Trump is wholly unfit for the job in terms of experience, intellect and character, and he has demeaned his office and his country for four long, sad years.
Biden is a lacklustre journeyman politician with few ideas and no charisma, whose only compelling claim to the presidency is that he is not Donald Trump.
It is still not clear that Americans, through the dysfunctional electoral system they inherited from the 18th century, have rejected Trump. How deeply disheartening.
How could it be that, after his disastrous first term, Trump still commands so much support that he remains within striking distance of a second term? We know what that would be like, and we know how bad it would be for America and the world.
Thankfully, Joe Biden still has a good chance, though a close result risks endless wrangling in the courts or, even worse, on the streets.
If he makes it to the Oval Office, Biden would restore decency, decorum and a measure of professional competence to the presidency of the United States. But relief at that prospect must be tempered by realism. Biden is not the leader to restore America’s cohesion at home and leadership abroad.
He would not recreate the engaged, effective and benevolent hyperpower that, in the heady aftermath of the Cold War, seemed set to preside over a world united by economic globalisation and democratic politics. That America, and that world, are gone forever.
Australia must learn to live with this.
Biden would face a bewilderingly divided country. The millions who still passionately support Trump would never accept him as their leader. America’s bitter partisan divide means that even a truly compelling figure such as Barack Obama would find it hard to unite the country.
Biden is anything but compelling. He has been a weak candidate and all the evidence suggests he would be a weak president, with no chance of building consensus around the major reforms required to address America’s problems.
And those problems go very deep.
Of course America has faced tough times before. In the late 1960s the Vietnam War and racial tensions seemed to be tearing the country apart. But back then America’s economy was by far the largest in the world, with an innovative and dynamic manufacturing sector and an unchallengeable lead in technology and innovation. Wealth and opportunities were much more evenly distributed, its health and education systems were the envy of the world, and its political system, though always rambunctious, worked to provide effective government.
We cannot assume that America will prove as resilient today as it was 50 years ago, because it is a different country now. Its deep racial and social divisions play out against a background of growing inequality, declining opportunities, failing public services and severe political dysfunction, all amplified by the challenges of climate change and rivalry with China.
It would take a massive and sustained program of reform and rebuilding to overcome these problems. That demands a leader with extraordinary political energy and skills. Biden is a far better person than Trump, but he is not that leader.
So whatever the outcome, this election has grave implications for Australia.
Economically, it means America will not regain its old place as a key engine of globalisation, innovation and economic growth. The slide from free trade to protectionism will continue, and the reforms required to rebuild globally competitive manufacturing will not happen.
China’s economy will overtake America’s to become the largest in the world on any measure, and it will continue to erode America’s technological lead. US leadership of the key international economic institutions will not be restored. Increasingly, China will set the rules and norms that govern the global economy.
None of this is good news for us.
The strategic outlook is even worse. America’s global leadership faces major trials in Europe and the Middle East, but it confronts its greatest challenge in east Asia, where China seeks to take its place as the dominant regional power.
But for all Washington’s tough talk of a new cold war to contain China, the Trump administration has done nothing effective to counter Beijing’s growing power and influence, and there is little chance that Biden would do any better.
He and his advisers, underestimating China’s strength and resolve, hope that mending relations with allies and tweaking defence plans will be enough to deter Beijing and restore US leadership.
That is a fantasy.
Containing China in its own backyard will require a massive US effort, with huge costs and risks. There is no reason to think that Biden is any more committed than Trump was to that kind of effort, and nor are the American people on either side of the political divide.
Biden or Trump, nothing will change this central fact: American power in Asia will fade, perhaps quite quickly, in the years ahead, and Australia will face the new Asia without a great and powerful friend.
Hugh White is emeritus professor of strategic studies at the Australian National University.
Hugh White is Emeritus Professor of Strategic Studies at Australian National University. He served for many years as a senior defence and intelligence official with the Australian government.
Comments
9 responses to “Whoever wins, Australia can’t rely on its great and powerful ally (AFR, Nov 4)”
“Biden is a lacklustre journeyman politician with few
ideas and no charisma, whose only compelling claim to the presidency is
that he is not Donald Trump.” I love how Australian academics pontificate about various foreign leaders’ abilities with such ease and certainty. Ah well, insularity breeds contempt. Beyond learning, the endemic Australian disease.
‘Containing China in its own backyard will require a massive US effort, with huge costs and risks.’
Then do not do it; it is a stupid idea – or did you mean ‘would require a massive….’
I go with Morris Berman – the current setup is a mistake so it’s time for Washington to exit the world stage so the rest of us can get on with a ”post-growth” society.
China doesn’t have to be an enemy, their system of government is different, but that does not preclude us from being trading and cultural friends. Fortunately there is no evidence of China being expansionist. Their two main concerns as Geoff Raby writes in his recent book is the security of its borders and preservation of the Communist Party, to which I would add freedom of its trade routes.
If only our political class and our strategic community in Canberra had the wisdom to see China, and all our Asian neighbors through a different lens, we could all look forward to a more prosperous and secure future.
Hear Hear as Sir Angus Houston and many other right minded, highly respected Australians have advised in this Blog. Some how Canberra must be under some “bad foreign influence” through propaganda from Trump and Pompeo etc and have locked in mindset that China via CCP have to be our enemy and have to be “contained or destroyed”‘. In our 21st century of modern civilized and democratic world, it is so pathetic and sad if we cannot even live side by side with so-called “evil communistic” nations no matter how you define it as human beings.. Worse still, it will be a catastrophic tragedy if we have to have a war , and may be a nuclear war, to prove who is right or wrong. Crazy people do crazy thing I suppose. It is so important that we have proper international rule based order through the Charter of UN to put a check and balance on these crazy people. Please support the rule of law and not the rule of force. It is important as human beings that everyone of us supports the International Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons of UN which will become international law by 22 January 2021. I hope Australia will sign and ratify it as well. May peace reign..
Under some “bad foreign influence” indeed Dr. Ka Sing Chua;-ever since the firsts fleet arrived at Botany Bay in 1788. With some notably exemptions of course, Curtin, Whitlam, Hawke and Keating to name some I recall, but now we have a simpering political class that prefer to hang on the coat tails of “Uncle Sam” than truly represent and protect the citizens of great country!
“American power in Asia will fade”.
The problem with almost all “strategic thinking” is that all or most human affairs are intended. However an accidental nuclear war (https://futureoflife.org/background/nuclear-close-calls-a-timeline/) is rarely taken into account.
The pre-WWI and pre-WWII strategic thinking is outmoded outmoded, since US and other global nuclear missile fleets are already larger than what it would take to destroy civilization, unless the “powers to be” miraculously decide to dismantle their missile fleets,
As stated by Albert Einstein: “The splitting of the atom has changed EVERYTHING, bar man’s way of thinking, and thus we drift into unparalleled catastrophes”
corrections:
change “the problem with all or most strategic thinking is that all or most human affairs are intended” to “the problems with all or most strategic thinking is that it assumes that”
Sadly, Hugh White has comprehensively nailed it.